I came across a disgruntled and fiery verbal out pour in a social
networking site. I
plead ignorance to
the intended target of the abuse,thanks to the generous spate of
insensitivity, the diction read a lot like...blah blah blah..this is
not a
shikandi prasthanam...blah blah blah..aanum pennum kettatu..blah blah
blah To get a better picture,I forced a second read. It was a
frustrated venting on what could be called as " lack of spine".The
venting itself is perfectly justified,and there is ample place for that
in many forums.But my question is,what is with the usage like 'aanum
pennum kettatu' or shikandi in the context of being
'cowardly./confused'. Such usages are outright sexist,and demeaning of
ones
identity.Words covertly meaning transgender are used as a handy slur in
agitated grumblings.The transgender identity is a
dignified a state,of mind and body as much as that of a male or a
female.Identity is each one's right.
A few days back,while waiting for an appointment,I got to see a
kannada film.The 15
minutes comprised of a rather imposing transgender,dressed in
a glitzy sari,flowers adorning the long plated hair,a large bindi.A side
kick
to the villain,she is a conniving shrewd.The flinging of hair,the
grimace,the walk,all
captured in an all too familiar slow motion.This is an
oft-repeated scene
in
mainstream cinema,across the border.For one,this is stereotype on
mannerisms.More cynical is that, the 'non-conformity' of transgender
is equated with negative characteristics.As far as the audience goes,it
requires a conscious effort from their part to question such
narratives.But,mostly they remain complacent.So,the message that sticks
with them is only the 'obvious'--transgender=non-confirmity=bad.There are some empathetic
portrayals
in
the films of recent years on the hardships and discrimination faced by them.That is a sure welcome to counter the
stereotype.
Recently , a teen was ruthlessly
murdered
after he was discovered to be a transgender..He was brutally mobbed,and
the parents wouldn't claim the body
for the shame it entailed.Though this happened in Africa,we in india,
don't have many reasons to pride ourselves.They are ostracized and many a
times cast away from their hometown. They build
their own communities,more often in big cities.The mostly held
perception among my friends in Bangalore is based only on the brief
encounters with them at the traffic stops.For the urban crowd,they are
just a group who sing and clap and ask money at the signals.
What remains hidden is the lack of oppurtunity and the
discrimination meted out, making it hard for them to get a career
available to the 'normal' people.Many are driven to earn a living as sex
workers.Bangalore's Majestic subway is a known 'pick-up' point.They
proceed callously,through the hussle and bustlle.Right there,is the
vicious circle operating,and it could very well remain the same for
decades.Where the identity itself isn't acknowledged,all other things
become secondary.Volunteer organisations often bring to light are many
instances where they are denied timely attention in hospitals,citing
lame excuses as to which ward are they to be accommodated. They often
need the assistance of NGOs to assert the basic
rights available to 'normal' citizens.In the majority of application
forms and in legal
transactions,there is place only for an M or an F within the
boxes! Of course,it can be left unfilled but it speaks volumes about the
'don't
ask don't say' policy'. This absence intimidates even those who want
to
come out of the closets.
For the very reason that it's
exclusionist,the main stream gender
perception is
problematic.Its always aligned with binary of male/female as is taught
in
the biology classes. .The 'he' and 'she'
reproduce to make,again, a male or a female.Simple.Binary.Life goes
on.Since the male and the
female is
dealt extensively at the secondary levels in schools, at the least,it
warrants an acknowledgement of transgender as a different
possibility.Thinking that I might be proved wrong,I set out to explore
my 9th grader niece's biology text.But,I wasn't.Nothing much has changed
since my schooldays in this respect.I don't find the term in
her book,although it deals with the other two genders profusely. She
tells me that slurs
meaning to be transgender are something they use to poke fun at each
other.Intentionally or otherwise, an identity is reduced to an adjective
or a slur.True,
that transgender is a complex topic and is
an umbrella term accommodating many differences.But,does that justify
the omission,which is a scientific reality? The
text books also follow a silent policy which goes hand in hand with a
society obsessed with the binary.The secretive and mystery element
feeds unto itself,making way for much demeaning and insensitive
behavior.Open
discourses will have to proceed with legal concurrence in acknowledging
the transgender identity and mitigating the negative construct of
the majority imposed on them.